Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that's normally employed for even ten per cent of its possible.
What's it to get the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the individual has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's only the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of the modern era that dates back to the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the group can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film additionally winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided the diver watches ought to be the very first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it's also from this day the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose origins would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even once you need to wash the palms.
But a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the features and constructive characteristics of those references.
I've a long standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee these performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the performance of the system that reports the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency read more of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to certain rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal use, what we all know is the best, the best sub may be in the end a watchable to offer features much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is get more info not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely on a screw-on crown, better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who'd never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely on a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown isn't completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why an abyssal super dive watch might have to be rushed to a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on very few versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and as a result, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume pick on the fly : either leave your diver somewhere safe or obligatorily create a closing but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen together a little 'of issues linked to the time that must meet the water, and also given the essential information, I show you which - at least so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I've split them into two classes. The order in which they appear does not represent any position.